Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility SETARA Institute: Human Rights Not a Priority for the Jokowi–JK Administration - Setara
Find the Media Publications You Need

SETARA Institute: Human Rights Not a Priority for the Jokowi–JK Administration

Release DateDecember 10, 2016CategoryNews & CoverageShare

VIVA.co.id – The administration of President Joko Widodo and Vice President Jusuf Kalla was assessed as not prioritizing human rights (HR) issues in its government agenda. Instead, President Jokowi was considered to place greater emphasis on economic development and infrastructure than on the promotion and protection of human rights.

This assessment was reflected in the findings of a survey conducted by SETARA Institute to mark International Human Rights Day, observed annually on 10 December.

“Human rights are not a priority for the Jokowi–JK administration. If we look at the three key policy documents—the 2015–2019 National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN), the National Human Rights Action Plan (RANHAM), and the Government Work Plan—it is clear that human rights are not treated as a priority,” said Bonar Tigor Naipospos, Deputy Executive Director of SETARA Institute, during a press conference in Cikini, Jakarta, on Wednesday, 9 December 2015.

SETARA Institute’s Director of Research, Ismail Hasani, explained that the survey was conducted to evaluate the annual state of human rights in Indonesia.

The survey was intended to provide an overview of the country’s human rights situation while also serving as a reference for improving the government’s performance in the future.

According to Ismail, the survey involved 215 respondents from diverse backgrounds, including academics, researchers, activists, community leaders, and lawyers. Data were collected through questionnaires using a perception index scale ranging from 0 as the lowest score to 7 as the highest.

Ismail noted that the survey measured eight key variables: the resolution of past human rights violations; freedom of expression; freedom of religion or belief; citizens’ sense of security and state protection; the abolition of the death penalty; the elimination of discrimination; economic, social, and cultural rights; as well as the National Human Rights Action Plan (RANHAM) and the performance of human rights institutions.

The survey results indicated that while several variables showed improvement, others experienced decline. One of the most significant decreases was in the variable concerning the abolition of the death penalty. In 2014, the survey recorded a score of 2.18, but one year later it had fallen to 1.99.

“The government received a poor score because it carried out executions of death row inmates,” said Ismail.

Overall, Indonesia’s Human Rights Index declined slightly from 2.49 to 2.45 during the year. By comparison, the index had increased, albeit modestly, between 2013 and 2014.

Ismail stated that the earlier increase reflected respondents’ optimism that President Jokowi’s development agenda would bring meaningful improvements. However, after one year in office, the government’s implementation did not match its commitments.

“For example, the promise to resolve past human rights violations was clearly stated in the Nawacita agenda, but its quality was significantly diluted in the National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN),” Ismail said. (ase)

Source: nasional.news.viva.co.id

Related Media

Explore Media

View more

Police Investigators and Detectives Should Be Judicial Police Officers

News & Coverage
December 16, 2025
Security Sector Reform

President Prabowo Subianto has responded to public proposals regarding the police. These proposals emerged during...

View Detail

Freedom of Religions and Beliefs Conditions 2024

News & Coverage
June 1, 2025
Freedom of Religion/Belief

In 2024, SETARA Institute released an annual report on the situation of Freedom of Religions...

View Detail

Has the State Been Fair to Women?

News & Coverage
March 4, 2025
Law and the Constitution

Deeply rooted patriarchal norms continue to pose a major obstacle to accelerating gender equality. In...

View Detail